Ruthless Ditwah; A Brief on Governance, Legal Aspects and International Humanitarian Support
During the final week of November 2025, the ordinary lives of Sri Lankans were abruptly disrupted by the ruthless and catastrophic cyclonic storm “Ditwah” which battered the island with heavy rainfall, unprecedented floods and deadly landslides. Unfortunately, it went on to cause hundreds of deaths and substantial damage to a vast number of private properties and public infrastructure.
However, in the usual Sri Lankan
spirit, many brave hearts in and out of uniform answered the urgent call of
duty and proceeded to assist the affected communities. Even foreign nations mobilized
their support swiftly to augment SL’s relief and rescue efforts. Subsequently,
the government declared a “State of Public Emergency” to handle the situation.
In this context, this article aims
to briefly discuss the following areas.
- Governance
and Natural Disasters
- Legal
Aspects of Disaster Management
- International
Humanitarian Support
- Suggestions
for the future
Governance
and Natural Disasters
Governing a country is no easy
task, and it requires wise leaders to say the very least. Among various other
responsibilities, governments have a sacred obligation to safeguard the nation
and its citizenry from all sorts of dangers. Our experiences from 2019 to 2025 itself
clearly testify to the diversity of the dangers that we face today. This
concept of governance is more fully described by theories such as Hobbes’s
Social Contract Theory. In today’s context, it is strengthened by various legal
concepts, including Fundamental Rights, Administrative Law concepts, etc.
However, the basic sense of
governance during natural disasters is not a contemporary or extraordinary
phenomenon. For example, the celebrated treatise on statecraft – Arthashastra,
written more than 2000 years ago, acknowledges the King’s obligation to protect
his kingdom from national calamities including floods. But how
can a king protect his kingdom from floods?
Unless he has divine powers or has
taken proactive steps to mitigate or remove the consequences of flooding, even
a King is unlikely to protect his kingdom from such disasters. However, Arthashastra
notes certain precautionary measures such as: removing the villagers living
on the banks of rivers to higher ground during rainy seasons, providing them
with wooden planks, bamboo and boats, and rescuing persons being carried off by
floods etc. It even specifies a legal penalty for those neglecting rescue. Therefore,
Arthashastra, despite being an ancient document, provides wise counsel by
highlighting both proactive and reactive measures to be taken in disaster
situations.
In today’s context, these
responsibilities are statutorily defined. For example, as per the Extraordinary
Gazette No. 2412/08, functions of the Minister of Defense (as per the
Constitution, the President is the Minister of Defense) include:
- Forecasting
natural disasters and sensitizing relevant sectors and institutions
- Conducting
rescue operations during natural and man-made disaster.
- Landslide
disaster management and related research and development.
- Coordination
of awareness programs on natural and man-made disasters
- Promotion
of disaster resilient construction and provision of technical guidance
Therefore, in this background, it is important to investigate and identify the strengths and lacunae of Sri Lanka’s governance surrounding Ditwah in light of the massive loss of life and property damage it wreaked. Such inquiry can be done by assessing the compatibility of governance with legal concepts such as fundamental rights, legality, procedural propriety, reasonableness, and proportionality. An endeavor of this nature must not be for revanchist ends but for drawing meaningful lessons and reforms for the future, and to hold those accountable where appropriate.
Legal
Aspects of Disaster Management
There are a number of laws in Sri
Lanka that are useful and relevant to handling disastrous situations. Following
is a discussion on some of those laws.
Public Security Ordinance – The
Grand Old Law
Following Ditwah, despite GOSL’s
ability to announce a “State of Disaster” under the Sri Lanka Disaster
Management Act No. 13 of 2005, a “State of Public Emergency” under the Public
Security Ordinance (“PSO”) was declared. Therefore, it is
appropriate to look at this grand old law and its relevancy to disaster
management.
The legacy of PSO can be traced
back to the colonial period where it was enacted on the 11th June 1947.
It allows the President to declare a “State of Public Emergency” and promulgate
“Emergency Regulations” which can even suspend, amend, override ordinary laws
except the constitution (Vide Article 155 of the Constitution).
Therefore, it is an extraordinary law
that confers on the President an exceptional law-making power, which is usually
exercised by the Parliament subject to many procedural constraints. Since this
mechanism goes against legal concepts such as the Separation of Powers
Doctrine, it could be extremely dangerous in the hands of an authoritative
leader. However, the rationale behind this law is that, certain public
emergencies necessitate the President “to act decisively and within a short
space of time” (Vide SC/FR/246,261,262,274,276/2022 Judgement dated 23rd
July 2025).
In my opinion, PSO is one of the
most useful laws available to an Executive President to swiftly and effectively
manage serious public emergency situations. However, that is only if he uses it
in good faith.
Criteria for Emergency Law Making
by the President
Under Section 2 of PSO, President can
declare a “State of Public Emergency” and invoke Part II of PSO, which allows
him to make emergency regulations. As per Section 5(1) of PSO, President can
make Emergency Regulations:
·
in
the interest of public security and Preservation of public order and the
suppression of mutiny, riot or civil commotion; or
·
for
the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the life of the community
According to Section 5(2), such Emergency Regulations could provide for the detention of persons, property requisitions, entry and search of premises, payment of compensation, apprehension and punishments, and amending or suspending ordinary laws, etc.
Some Historical Examples of
Emergency Regulations
Since its inception, various
governments across the political isle have used emergency regulations in
various situations. Udagama (2015) notes an interesting phenomenon in this
regard as follows;
The Left’s embrace of the PSO while
in office is palpably ironical in that left-wing political parties in Sri Lanka
had consistently opposed the adoption and operation of the PSO (p.289).
Following are some instances where
PSO was used.
- To
implement the demonetization endeavor in 1970.
- To
quell the JVP terrorism in the 70s and 80s.
- To
quell the LTTE terrorism
- To
ensure food security during Covid 19 pandemic in 2021.
Differing Perceptions; Covid v.
Ditwah
Considering the grave threat to SL’s
food security during COVID 19, then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa declared a
“state of public emergency” and issued “Emergency (Provision of Essential
Food) Regulations No 01 of 2021”.
Then opposition MP Anura Kumara Dissanayake,
while voting against it in the Parliament, noted the following;
“ජනාධිපතිවරයා මහජන ආරක්ෂක පනතේ
II කොටස ක්රියාත්මක කර තිබෙනවා… ඉතිහාසයේ පුරාවටම තමුන්නාන්සේලාත් අපිත් ඒ නීතියට විරුද්ධව කථා කල මිනිස්සු...
එම නිසා කන්න හිතුනම, කබරගොයත් තලගොයා වෙන න්යාය ඒ තරම් හොද නැහැ කියා මම හිතනවා.”
“සාමාන්යයෙන්
පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ පනත් කෙටුම්පතක් සම්මත වීමට පෙර අපට ශ්රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයට ගිහින් ඒ පනත්
කෙටුම්පත වග විභාගයට ලක් කරන්න පුළුවන්. හැබැයි හදිසි නීති රෙගුලාසි හරහා පනවන නීති
කිසිවක් අධිකරණයේදී විවාදයට ලක් කරන්න බැහැ”
(Vide Parliament Hansard of 06th
September 2021)
Further, noting that Covid 19
pandemic is a disaster, Anura Kumara Dissanayake, urged then President to utilize
the Sri Lanka Disaster Management Act No. 13 of 2005 instead of the PSO
(NewsFirst, 2021). Interestingly, 04 years later, President Anura Kumara
Dissanayake used that same Public Security Ordinance to manage the natural
disaster caused by Ditwah.
Accordingly, on 28th of
November 2025, GOSL issued an Extraordinary Gazette declaring a “State of Public
Emergency” invoking the Part II of PSO. On the same day, “Emergency
(Miscellaneous Provisions and Powers) Regulations No 01 of 2025” was
published.
Following is a very short comparison between 2021 Emergency Regulations and 2025 Ditwah Emergency Regulations.
|
2021 Emergency
(Provision of Essential Food) Regulations No 01 of 2021 |
2025 Emergency
(Miscellaneous Provisions and Powers) Regulations No 01 of 2025 |
|
·
Had an Objective Clause ·
Noticeable regulations –
|
· No
Objective Clause · Noticeable regulations –
|
Therefore, while 2021 Emergency Regulations were short and more specific to the objective of ensuring food security, the 2025 Ditwah Emergency Regulations contained a number of additional regulations concerning the personal liberties of the citizenry.
However, President Anura Kumara
Dissanayake verbally assured that emergency regulations would only be used to
contain the natural disaster. Yet, after a few days’ time, the Deputy Minister
of Public Security instructed the Police to take action against those spreading
defamatory remarks about the President on social media (Newswire, 2025).
Is it Justifiable to use Emergency
Regulations to contain Ditwah?
In my view, a democratically
elected President must possess well defined yet discretionary and extraordinary
powers to manage public emergency situations that demand immediate and
exceptional measures. In such situations, time would not be a luxury, and omissions
could be fatal.
The disaster caused by Ditwah
was far from ordinary. People were stranded in affected areas for days without
proper communication, medicine, food, and water. Some faced life or death
situations. The destruction to property and infrastructure was unimaginable. Therefore,
it surely required an immediate and coordinated inter-agency relief effort. Additionally,
the declaration of a “State of Public Emergency” also has a mental and
strategic aspect of sending a clear message to the world and to our own
citizens as to what we are going through.
Hence, in principle, I agree with
the use of emergency regulations to contain the disaster caused by Ditwah.
However, upon examining the actual regulations, I wish that more content had
been dedicated to the provision of swift and coordinated relief to the victims than
to combating rumors and false statements, which can also be done under the
ordinary law. However, it is equally important to end the emergency rule as
soon as the circumstances allow.
SL Disaster Management Act
In the aftermath of the 2004 tsunami,
SL Parliament enacted the Sri Lanka Disaster Management Act No. 13 of 2005 (“DMA”),
which currently serves as the primary law on managing man-made and natural
disasters. Among others, it provided for the creation of the National Council
for Disaster Management and the Disaster Management Center.
National Council for Disaster
Management (“Council”)
The Council is composed of various
high-ranking officials including the President, PM, Opposition Leader,
Ministers, Chief Ministers, and opposition MPs. Under Section 5 of DMA, it is
mandatory to have council meetings at least once in 03 months and they are
legally obliged to meet “as often as may be necessary”.
Some of the Council’s statutory functions
are as follows.
- Formulating
the National Policy & Program on Disaster Management, National Disaster
Management Plan, and the National Emergency Operation Plan.
- Monitoring
the implementation of above 02 plans.
- Appraising
the Cabinet with information relevant to potential and actual disasters.
- Facilitating
emergency response, recovery, relief etc. in the event of a disaster.
- Taking
all measures necessary to counter/mitigate any disaster
Ditwah highlighted the importance of the National
Council for Disaster Management, similar to the National Security
Council following the Easter Sunday Attacks in 2019.
Disaster Management Center
Disaster Management Center is a
bureaucratic institution headed by a Director General. Some of its statutory
functions are as follows.
- Taking responsibility in implementing the National Disaster Management Plan and the National Emergency Operation Plan.
- Implementing programs for disaster mitigation, prevention, relief and obtaining financial assistance from the Treasury.
- Issuing instructions and guidelines to “appropriate organizations”, NGOs, district/divisional secretaries on disaster management activities.
Currently, the Disaster
Management Center functions under the Ministry of Defense (Vide Extraordinary
Gazette No. 2412/08 dated 25.11.2024).
Policies and Plans
There are a number of plans and
policies that are required to be formulated and implemented under the DMA as
follows.
· National Policy & Program on Disaster Management
· National Disaster Management Plan
· National Emergency Operation Plan
· Disaster Management Plans by all governmental ministries, departments, public corporation in line with national plans.
However, the efficacy of these plans
must be evaluated in light of the destruction and massive loss of life caused
by Ditwah. It is also important to ensure that these plans are integrated,
comprehensible, and easily accessible.
Declaration of a “State of Disaster”
under Disaster Management Act
Even under normal circumstances,
the Council and the Disaster Management Center are legally
required and empowered to handle disasters as per the established policies and
plans under DMA. However, as per Section 11 of DMA, the GOSL can declare a “State
of Disaster” where a crisis is so severe that the required counter-measures are
beyond the resources or means normally available to the administration. With
such declaration, additional capabilities become available to the government.
· President can direct the “appropriate organizations” to use all available resources (as may be necessary) and additional resources (when they become available as per allocation arrangements) to counter/mitigate the effects of the disaster.
· Government agencies become legally bound to implement their respective disaster management plans, even without Presidential directions as above.
· National Council for Disaster Management can obtain the assistance of any NGO to assist the appropriate organizations, and thereby, such NGOs become bound to act accordingly.
· The “appropriate organization” directed by the President becomes duty bound to;
¾ Enter any place for saving lives, rescuing persons etc.
¾ Evacuate people, property and animals
¾ Close roads till Police/Armed Forces arrive
¾ Remove obstructions impeding the disaster counter measures
¾ Do any other reasonably necessary acts for implementing disaster countermeasures
· Persons who suffer loss or damage to property due to an act/omission or default of an appropriate organizations or Police/Military Officers become eligible for compensation.
Is the Declaration of a State of
Disaster Strong Enough?
Based on the above, it is clear
that there are some additional benefits in declaring a “State of Disaster”.
However, even without such a declaration, the National Council for Disaster
Management and the Disaster Management Center have the legal
authority to carry out disaster relief work under DMA.
While the Disaster Management Act
allows the President to issue directions, the Public Security Ordinance authorizes
the President to promulgate wide ranging emergency regulations having priority
over all ordinary laws except for the Constitution. These could regulate many
aspects of governance including relief work coordination, property requisition,
declaration and maintenance of essential services, prevention of misinformation,
prohibition of entry into certain unsafe areas etc.
Therefore, in an extraordinary
emergency, the political leadership is much more likely to declare a “State of
Public Emergency” under the Public Security Ordinance than declaring a “State
of Disaster” under the Disaster Management Act.
As an alternative, the government
could explore the prospects of amending the Disaster Management Act to empower the
President to issue “Emergency Disaster Regulations” within a defined but
flexible criterion during a “state of disaster”.
For example, such regulations could
provide for relief work coordination; legal movement of foreign aid vehicles in
disaster areas; requisition of services/properties/vehicles; prohibition of
entry into unsafe areas; deterring misinformation etc., They may even supersede
ordinary laws, except for the constitution, if and where appropriate.
Such a reform to the DMA would
improve the optics of governance during disasters.
Police and Military Laws concerning
Disaster Management
During all kinds of national disasters,
our Armed Forces and the Police Service have answered the nation’s call of duty
bravely and unconditionally. Unfortunately, during Ditwah, SL lost a
brave helicopter pilot and naval personnel engaged in relief and rescue
efforts. There were many other officers who assisted those in need, often putting
their own lives at risk.
Some of the legal provisions that
facilitate such Police and Military responses to disasters are discussed below.
Police Ordinance 1865
Under Section 75 of the Police
Ordinance, Police officers must visit “all cases of fire or other calamity… for
the protection of such persons and property as may be endangered thereby”.
Under this section, Police is also authorized to call upon persons to aid and
assist them in that behalf.
Army Act 1949
Under Section 23A of the Army Act,
the President can order the Army to perform such non-military duties as
he may consider necessary in national interest.
Navy Act
Under Section 21 of the Navy Act,
the President can order the Navy to perform such non-naval duties as he
may consider necessary in national interest.
Air Force Act
Similarly, under Section 23A of the
Air Force Act, President can order the Air Force to perform duties necessary in
national interest.
SL Disaster Management Act &
Plans thereunder
Under the DMA, the Armed Forces and
Police are required to be prepared with disaster management plans in line with
the national plan.
Further, the National Emergency
Operation Plan, formulated under DMA, highlights several functions of the
Armed Forces and Police including the following. (Disaster Management Center,
2017).
· All the Police Stations in the Island are first to receive information of any disaster situation and be present at the location to manage the situation till others come and Police can contact the Emergency Operation Center for additional support if needed.
· Just before the disaster, Police and Armed Forces are responsible for dissemination of Early Warnings to communities.
· Emergency Operation Center can coordinate with Air Force to provide additional air support.
· Military Search and Rescue Teams have been trained, equipped and stationed at strategic locations covering the entire country.
· DMC has direct contact with the Police and Military to enlist their assistance.
· Navy Rapid Response Rescue & Relief Squadron are also to support rescue missions.
· Police are responsible for providing facilities and security at safe centers, and for search and rescue efforts.
· Police and Armed Forces are responsible for making temporary shelters and other facilities, and providing ground level logistics.
Registration of Deaths (Temporary
Provisions) Act No. 19 of 2010
Natural disasters bring many
undesired consequences, including the loss of a large number of lives at once.
Sometimes, entire families and communities are subjected to such horrendous
mass fatalities. In this context, this law provides for the registration of
persons whose deaths are directly attributable to natural disasters.
Accordingly, where the application
of ordinary law to register deaths resulting from a natural disaster has become
impractical, the Registrar General can declare “National Disaster Affected
Areas”. Where a person who had been residing in or present within such a declared
area cannot be found following such natural disaster, a next of kin or any
other person having knowledge of such individual may apply to register the
death and obtain a death certificate. It also provides for the registration of
deaths of foreign nationals due to such natural disasters.
On 02nd December 2025,
following Ditwah, the Registrar General declared 22 out of 25 districts
as “Natural Disaster Affected Areas”. Only Galle, Matara, and Hambantota districts
were not so declared.
Supplementary to various laws, there
are several important administrative circulars and guidelines relevant to disaster
management. They outline the ground level implementation of disaster management
and relief activities by the concerned government institutions.
Disaster Relief Services Circular
No. 01/2025
This circular was issued by the
Secretary to the Ministry of Defense and was addressed to the Secretaries of
Ministries, Chief Secretaries, Departmental Heads, District Secretaries
(Government Agents), and Divisional Secretaries. Accordingly, it notes the
division of responsibilities relevant to disaster management, as follows;
· Ministry of Defense
¾ Provision of Urgent Disaster Relief
¾ Provision of compensation for housing and property damage
¾ Restoration of homes for children, elders and disabled persons.
· Relevant Line ministries
¾ Reconstruction of infrastructure, places of worship, state and public buildings
¾ Provision of other statutory compensations.
It also outlines the relief to be
given to victims of natural disasters; including the amounts of compensation for
housing and property damage; and funds for families to purchase dry rations,
sanitary items, etc. Further, it stipulates instructions on quick reactions to
disasters, the provision of drinking water, and the payment of water and
electricity bills of safety centers.
As per this circular, districts are
also required to share their disaster management equipment with other districts
that are affected by natural disasters. Further, District and Divisional Secretaries
are required to work in coordination with the National Disaster Relief
Services Center when managing such situations and to follow the Disaster
Relief Services Guideline No. 01/2025 discussed below.
Disaster Relief Services Guideline No. 01/2025
This guideline was issued by the
Secretary to the Ministry of Defense and was addressed to all District and
Divisional Secretaries. It lays down the responsibilities of government
agencies, some of which are as follows.
·
Divisional
Secretariat
¾
Facilitating
Divisional and Rural Disaster Management and Relief Services
Committees, which are required to maintain safety centers and have them
geotagged using google maps, etc.
¾ Sending a “status report” within 24 hours of the occurrence of a natural disaster to the District Secretary.
·
District
Secretariat
¾
Facilitating
District Disaster Management and Relief Services Committee.
¾
Dispatching
a “status report” within 24 hours to the National Disaster Relief Services
Center based on the status reports sent by the Divisional Secretaries.
¾
Obtaining
the relevant funds from Natural Disaster Relief Services Center.
¾
Dispatching
relevant funds to Divisional Secretaries without a delay.
¾
Maintenance
of data relating to natural disasters
¾ Making reports on donations, expenses etc.
·
National
Disaster Relief Services Center
¾
Obtaining
relevant funds from the National Budget Department of Treasury.
¾
Dispatching
funds to District Secretaries swiftly, as per their requests.
¾
Coordinating
the efforts to obtain foreign aid and grants, and ensuring that they are duly
distributed to the victims.
¾
Upkeeping
of information based on status reports by District Secretariats.
¾
Upkeeping
of circulars, guidelines, and a Contingency Data Base, etc.
¾
Maintaining
a register on extensive disasters.
¾
Solving
issues forwarded by rural, divisional and district committees through the National
Council for Disaster Management.
This guideline also details the
provision of cooked meals, drinking water, tea, and dry rations, etc. to those
stranded in safety centers and victimized. It also provides instructions on the
selection of safety centers, payment of allowances to officials, and ensuring
quick reactions upon warnings, etc.
Further, important details such as documents required to obtain relief
are also mentioned therein.
Laws on the Allocation of Funds for
Natural Disasters
Another important aspect of managing
national disasters is the allocation of necessary funds to finance immediate
rescue, relief, and rebuilding efforts. Following are some of the important
laws in this regard.
Constitution of the Republic
Under Article 148 of the
Constitution, Parliament has full control over public finances. Therefore, it
is with parliamentary authority that funds get allocated to various purposes.
Under Article 151 of the
Constitution, Parliament can pass a law creating a “Contingency Fund” to
face urgent and unforeseen expenses where no provision for such expenditure
exists. However, provisions necessary for expenditure relating to disasters are
generally provided for by various legal instruments.
Public Financial Management Act No.
44 of 2024 (“PFMA”)
This law provides for the
management and control of public finances, including the preparation and
approval of the Annual Budget and any adjustments thereunder.
Annual Budget
As per Section 18 of PFMA, annual
budget includes the estimates of expenditure of public entities. As mandated by
the Section 21, the finance minister is required to submit the Appropriation
Bill (budget bill) for the forthcoming financial year to the Parliament on or
before the 15th October of each year.
Annual budgets allow for proactive
measures concerning natural disasters by allocating funds to face potential disasters.
For example, as mentioned in Annex 01 of Budget Circular No. 08/2025,
many relief allowances to be given to Ditwah victims were appropriated
from the Ministry of Defense expenditure head, as per the 2025 Budget.
However, where necessary funds are
either unavailable or insufficient, the following reactive mechanisms become
useful.
Virement Procedure
As per Section 24 of PFMA, a
transfer of an allocation within a head of expenditure in annual Appropriation
Act can be made subject to certain restrictions. However, a transfer cannot be
made from one head to another, or from capital expenditure to recurrent
expenditure.
Annual Budget Reserve (Optional)
As per Section 25 of PFMA, an
Appropriation Act may include an appropriation for contingencies called
the “Annual Budget Reserve”. Thereby, where existing allocations are
insufficient, the funds in such “Annual Budget Reserve” could be allocated to
cover urgent, unforeseen, and unavoidable requirements as defined in written
laws.
Supplementary Estimates Mechanism
Under Section 26 of PFMA, a supplementary
estimate proposal can be submitted to the Parliament to get an “additional
expenditure” approved, upon the occurrence of;
· An unforeseen and unavoidable circumstances such as a natural disaster, and
· A need for additional expenditure which is not covered under Appropriation Act, and
· Impossibility of covering such additional expenditure through a virement procedure, contingency fund, or the annual budget reserve.
Appropriation Act, No 03 of 2025
As mentioned above, the expenses for
providing relief to Ditwah victims were appropriated from the Ministry
of Defense expenditure head under this Budget Act. However, apart from such
specific allocations, the Appropriation Act 2025 also provides for the transfer
of funds where necessary.
A “Virement Procedure” as mentioned
in PFMA and discussed above, is provided for under Section 5 of the
Appropriation Act 2025. Thereby, any money allocated for recurrent expenditure which
has not been expended or are not likely to be expended can be transferred
within that head by order of the Secretary to the Treasury.
Additionally, Section 6 of the
Appropriation Act 2025 provides for the transfer of money allocated for development
activities under the Department of National Budget Head into any other program
under any other head as a supplementary allocation by order of the Secretary to
the Treasury.
Disaster Relief Services Circular
No. 01/2025
This circular, also discussed
above, contains the practical process of allocating funds for the provision
of urgent disaster relief. Accordingly, the Treasury would allocate
necessary funds to the Ministry of Defense. Thereafter, the Ministry
would dispatch those funds through the National Disaster Relief
Services Center to the relevant District Secretariats
as per their requests.
Budget Circular No. 07/2025
The Treasury Secretary issued this
circular to all Chief Secretaries of the Provincial Councils following the Ditwah
disaster. Accordingly, it instructed the Chief Secretaries to source funds from
the savings of capital expenditures already allocated to them for the urgent
restoration and improvement of provincial roads, bridges, hospitals,
dispensaries, minor irrigation systems, schools, and buildings providing state
services.
Budget Circular No. 08/2025
This circular was issued by the
Treasury Secretary and was addressed to all Ministerial Secretaries, Chief
Secretaries, Heads of Departments, District and Divisional Secretaries. It
announced GOSL’s “Empowerment Program” to provide relief to the people affected
by the Ditwah emergency disaster.
Accordingly, it announced the
relief allowances to be given to victims under various circumstances. Further, it
noted that this circular did not preclude the payment of certain types of
relief granted under the Disaster Relief Services Circular No. 01/2025. It
also instructed the officials to use Disaster Relief Services Guideline No.
01/2025 when selecting beneficiaries and assessing damages for relief under
this circular.
Procurement Laws Concerning
Disaster Management
Once the necessary funds are allocated,
it becomes necessary for the local officials to procure goods and services to
provide urgent relief to victims affected by the disaster. Following are some
of the applicable laws in that regard.
Constitution of the Republic
As per Article 156C, the National
Procurement Commission formulates guidelines for the procurement of goods,
services, and works by government institutions.
Public Financial Management Act No
44 of 2024
Therefore, under Section 32 of
PFMA, all public entities are required to procure goods, services, works in
line with such procurement procedures contained in written laws and guidelines
issued by the National Procurement Commission.
Procurement Guidelines – 2024 on
Goods, Works, and Non-Consulting Services
These were published by the National
Procurement Commission pursuant to Article 156C of the Constitution. Among
many other important rules, following are relevant to disaster situations.
Section 2.9 of the guidelines notes
that the Procurement Committees established at different levels have varying
financial thresholds to make recommendations and determinations of contract
awarding. Importantly, where a procuring entity needs to engage in procurement
actions exceeding the given financial threshold due to an emergency, it is
required to follow the procedure in Section 2.9A of the Procurement Manual
2024.
Accordingly, under Section 2.9A of
the Procurement Manual, in extremely urgent and exceptional
circumstances, the competent authorities mentioned therein could authorize
deviations after recording reasons with copy to the Auditor General.
Emergency procurements are
discussed in Section 3.1.8 of the Guidelines. Accordingly, a procuring entity may
use this method in exceptional circumstances including natural disasters to
meet unforeseen social obligations and other similar situations. A formal
covering approval for any emergency procurement must be obtained from the
appropriate authority at the first available opportunity.
Section 3.1.8 of the Procurement
Manual notes the situations in which emergency procurement procedures may be
used, including natural disasters. Under this mechanism, procuring entities
could relax certain procurement procedures such as the bidding period, advance
payments, bidder’s qualifications, with prior approval.
Budget circular No. 05/2025
Following Ditwah, this
circular was issued by the Treasury Secretary to all District and Divisional
Secretaries.
Based on information from the
Procurement Commission, the Treasury Secretary instructed that Divisional
Secretaries could carry out procurement activities up to 50 million, as
prescribed in Section 2.9 of the Procurement Guidelines 2024. Thereby, he ordered
the District Secretaries to immediately grant authority to Divisional Secretaries
to expend up to 50 million.
Further, it instructed them to take
action on emergency procurements under Section 3.1.8 of the Procurement
Guidelines 2024 for the purpose of providing relief to victims of Ditwah.
Budget circular No. 06/2025
This was another post-Ditwah
circular issued by the Treasury Secretary to all Ministerial Secretaries, Chief
Secretaries, District Secretaries, and Heads of Departments. They were also
instructed to take action on emergency procurements under Section 3.1.8 of the
Procurement Guidelines 2024 to restore the disrupted lives of people affected
by Ditwah.
***
This marks the end of the discussion on legal aspects of disaster management. Accordingly, there are a number of laws in SL that concern disaster management efforts. However, it is important to evaluate them and make adjustments to meet ground level realities where necessary.
International
Humanitarian Support
In times of man-made and natural
disasters, many nations come forward to provide much needed and appreciated humanitarian
assistance to affected nations. There are many examples of this. However,
humanitarian actions by states are often discussed from the angles of values
and interests.
Interest based Humanitarian Support
Since ancient times, political entities
have designed their foreign policies to achieve both immediate and long-term
goals. Accordingly, a nexus between foreign policy interests and humanitarian
support is often made. It is also noted that humanitarian support is
influenced by various factors such as national security, economic interests,
and attainment of influence and power etc. (El
Taraboulsi-Mccarthy et al., 2016).
Value based Humanitarian Support
However, a value-based approach to
humanitarian support is generally celebrated. For example, former National
Security Adviser and Secretary of State of the United States, Henry Kissinger
(2014) highlighted the involvement of a moral dimension in humanitarian
foreign policy, in contrast to traditional foreign policy.
Testifying to this value-based
approach, the international community adopted the UN
General Assembly Resolution 46/182 in 1991. This resolution noted that
humanitarian assistance is of cardinal importance to the victims of natural
disasters. It further emphasized that states themselves have the primary
responsibility of handling natural disasters in their own territories. However,
it highlighted the limitations of national response capacities, and the
importance of international cooperation thereby.
However, international humanitarian
support presents a lifeline to those who are suffering, regardless of it being value
based or interest based.
Sri
Lankan Experience
Sri Lanka, being a country that follows
a long-standing non-alignment policy, has often received much needed
humanitarian support during grave man-made and natural calamities. International
support received during natural disasters such as the 1957 floods, 2004
tsunami, Covid 19 testifies to this fact.
Similarly, in response to Ditwah,
many benevolent nations arrived in SL with much needed humanitarian support to
augment her relief, rescue and rebuilding efforts. It was heartwarming to see
them engaged in such efforts side by side with Sri Lankan authorities.
India launched “Operation Sagar
Bandhu”. Accordingly, India dispatched their National Disaster Relief
Force together with Military Doctors, deployable field hospitals, and Air Assets
etc. Pakistan swiftly sent their relief teams including Z-9 Helicopters of the
Pakistan Navy. This reminded how India
and Pakistan, despite their bilateral tensions, and other nations across the Cold
War political divide, came forward to support Ceylon’s democratic institutions
during the 1971 JVP terrorism.
Further,
there were many other nations that helped SL to battle Ditwah. Some of
these nations were UAE, Japan, Russia, China, USA, Bangladesh, Australia, and
Maldives. More lives would have perished or further deteriorated if not for their
invaluable support.
Our
Responsibility
In
this context, it is our responsibility to honor and appreciate the nations that
supported us in numerous ways when we were troubled and weary. Therefore, it is
incumbent upon the authorities to undertake this task creatively, maybe even
involving actual beneficiaries. As citizens, we too have a role in this.
Further, in this same spirit, Sri Lanka should continue to fulfill her moral obligations by providing humanitarian support to other nations when they are in trouble. This will enhance Sri Lanka’s international image and showcase her true values to the world community.
Suggestions
for the Future
Disasters and failures provide
valuable opportunities to learn from our mistakes and to redesign and strengthen
our strategies. In general, it is appropriate to investigate what went wrong
in handling Ditwah to effect meaningful reforms in the future. In this
spirit, following are some suggestions for potential improvements.
01.
Improving
the Communication Network
During Ditwah,
communications between many affected areas and the rest of the country broke
down, causing massive mental stress and danger. Therefore, it is imperative to
understand the underlying reasons, and to strengthen our communication network
with the participation of governmental agencies and the telecommunication
industry.
02.
Evaluating
the National Policy and Plans
As discussed above, SL has a national
policy and a number of plans concerning disaster management. Yet, hundreds of innocent
people lost their lives when Ditwah hit us. At least some of these
deaths could have been prevented with stronger planning and management.
Therefore, it is extremely important to evaluate these policies and plans to
better handle disasters in the future. Most importantly, the plans should align
with the ground level realities and concerns. This must include the
strengthening of early warning systems and evacuation plans. Tips
from foreign agencies such as USA’s FEMA could be useful in this regard.
Further, it is important to give
priority to proactive steps on disaster management such as regulating
construction activities in vulnerable areas, improving disaster resilient
infrastructure, and periodical scientific checks for potential disasters such
as landslides. Moreover, regular trainings on general and area specific
disaster management procedures for officials as well as communities would also be
important.
National plans should also be drawn
up to address consequential challenges, such as food security, following national
disasters.
03.
Legal
Improvements
Laws concerning disaster management
in Sri Lanka, including the DMA enacted 20 years ago, must be evaluated
to identify areas that require improvements to suit modern day concerns and
technology.
A specific improvement would be to
allow the President to issue superseding “Emergency Disaster Regulations”, under
the DMA when a state of disaster is proclaimed.
Further, similar to Section 68
of the Public Financial Management Act, amending the DMA to statutorily recognize
the power of the Secretary to the Ministry of Disaster Management to issue
directives, circulars, and guidelines to government agencies on disaster
management and relief would provide greater clarity on his authority.
It is also important to ensure the
immediate availability of finances to the District and Divisional Secretaries
to take urgent relief measures. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the
current budgetary and procurement laws and procedures with reference to ground
level experiences during Ditwah to make improvements, if and where
necessary.
04.
Acknowledging
Heroes
Another important element is to
appreciate the real-life heroes, in and out of uniform, who volunteered
in numerous ways to help the affected communities. The reality is that it would
have been much harder for the government to manage Ditwah without their
assistance.
05. Acknowledging Benevolent Nations
and Strengthening SL’s Humanitarian Assistance
As mentioned above, it is of utmost
importance to honor and appreciate those nations that came forward to help SL during
Ditwah. This may be done creatively with the involvement of actual
beneficiaries. Further, SL should strengthen her efforts in providing
humanitarian support to other nations in times of disasters.
Conclusion
This article discussed various
aspects of disaster management in light of the destruction caused by Ditwah.
The chapter on governance considered how the responsibility of protecting
citizens from disasters has been a longstanding concept. It further highlighted
the importance of learning lessons from lacunae of governance during Ditwah for
the future. The chapter on Legal Aspects examined various laws on handling
disasters, and financing such endeavors. The chapter on International
Humanitarian Support briefly discussed the interest-based and value-based
approaches to humanitarian support and Sri Lanka’s experiences. Finally, the
chapter on suggestions provided some proposals for future improvements.
Final Remarks
The nature we love so much can also
be harsh at times. This dual nature, attributable to many things in life, is a
common reality. However, we too have a responsibility to change our own habits
and practices that are not environmentally sound.
We cannot bring back the lives we
lost. However, Sri Lanka, with its indomitable spirit, can and will rise from
the debris once again. But when that happens, we should not repeat the same
mistakes we did this time or any mistakes at all. So, let us learn from this
debacle for a greater, better, and safer tomorrow!
References
Disaster Management Center. (2017). National Emergency
Operation Plan. https://www.dmc.gov.lk/images/pdfs/NEOP/NEOP_English.pdf
El Taraboulsi-Mccarthy, S., Metcalfe-Hough, V., &
Willitts-King, B. (2016). Foreign policy and humanitarian action: an agenda
for inquiry HPG Working Paper. https://media.odi.org/documents/11125.pdf
Kissinger, H. (2014). World Order. Penguin Books.
Kodikara, S. U. (2008). Domestic Politics and Diplomacy.
NewsFirst. (2021). Emergency Regulations misleading; will
vote against it - says AKD. Newsfirst.lk. https://www.newsfirst.lk/2021/09/05/emergency-regulations-misleading-will-vote-against-it-says-akd
Newswire. (2025, December 3). Police instructed to use
emergency regulations to arrest those insulting President - Newswire.
Newswire. https://www.newswire.lk/2025/12/03/police-instructed-to-use-emergency-regulations-to-arrest-those-insulting-president/
Udagama, D. (2015). 6 An Eager Embrace: Emergency Rule
and Authoritarianism in Republican Sri Lanka.
https://www.cpalanka.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Reforming-Presidentialism-An-Eager-Embrace-Emergency-Rule-and-Authoritarianism-in-Republican-Sri-Lanka.pdf

Comments
Post a Comment